Open Access

The role of interleukin-18 in glioblastoma pathology implies therapeutic potential of two old drugs—disulfiram and ritonavir

Chinese Journal of Cancer201534:11

DOI: 10.1186/s40880-015-0010-1

Received: 14 October 2014

Accepted: 12 January 2015

Published: 9 April 2015

Abstract

Based on reporting in the last several years, an impressive but dismal list of cytotoxic chemotherapies that fail to prolong the median overall survival of patients with glioblastoma has prompted the development of treatment protocols designed to interfere with growth-facilitating signaling systems by using non-cytotoxic, non-oncology drugs. Recent recognition of the pro-mobility stimulus, interleukin-18, as a driver of centrifugal glioblastoma cell migration allows potential treatment adjuncts with disulfiram and ritonavir. Disulfiram and ritonavir are well-tolerated, non-cytotoxic, non-oncology chemotherapeutic drugs that are marketed for the treatment of alcoholism and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, respectively. Both drugs exhibit an interleukin-18–inhibiting function. Given the favorable tolerability profile of disulfiram and ritonavir, the unlikely drug-drug interaction with temozolomide, and the poor prognosis of glioblastoma, trials of addition of disulfiram and ritonavir to current standard initial treatment of glioblastoma would be warranted.

Keywords

Chemotherapy Disulfiram Glioblastoma Interleukin-18 Migration Ritonavir

Introduction

After diagnosis, the median overall survival of patients with glioblastoma is approximately 2 years [1]. The last advance in treatment was the introduction of the Stupp protocol in 2005, which involves maximal resection followed by temozolomide and irradiation [1,2]. Recurrence occurs in almost all treated patients [1]. Over 40 trials of various traditional cytotoxic cancer chemotherapeutic drugs reported in the last few years have failed to significantly improve outcomes for patients with glioblastoma [3,4].

The current paper was, in part, prompted by a paper by Yeh et al. [5] in 2012 that clearly noted the crucial role of interleukin-18 (IL-18) in driving the centrifugal migration of glioblastoma cells. Starting with a premise that “the mediators and cellular effectors of inflammation are important (growth-enhancing) constituents of the local environment of tumors,” Yeh et al. [5] showed that non-malignant brain resident microglia secreted increased active IL-18 when stimulated by a growing glioblastoma. The results of this study indicated that such triggering is via specific mediation of extracellular matrix proteins, particularly fibronectin and vitronectin synthesized and secreted by glioblastoma cells. This IL-18–stimulated centrifugal migration is an important link between glioblastoma pathology and treatment resistance [5,6]. If such data in support of a feed-forward cycle can be supported by further study, this would be a perfect example of “cancer cells communicating actively” with each other and with host cells and organs [7], giving us a tremendous insight into glioblastoma pathology with immediate treatment consequences, which this paper will delineate.

Review

IL-18 in glioblastoma

In line with the observations by Yeh et al. [5], IL-18 has been identified as an important growth- and motility-driving element in many cancers (Figure 1). IL-18 is generally initially synthesized as a 24-kDa pro–IL-18 form, later proteolytically maturing to its active 18-kDa form. Both processes have been identified in a variety of cancers, such as gastric cancer [8], squamous cell carcinoma [9,10], pancreatic cancer [11], epithelial ovarian cancer [12], both primary and bone metastatic non–small cell lung cancer [13], prostate cancer [14], small cell lung cancer [15], hepatocellular carcinoma [16], metastatic melanoma [17], and other human cancers.
Figure 1

Feed-forward interleukin-18 (IL-18) cycle. Schematic summary of the growth-enhancing feed-forward cycle reported by Yeh et al. [5] shows that microglial-synthesized IL-18 (red triangles) facilitates the migration of glioblastoma and that glioblastoma-synthesized fibronectin (F) or vitronectin (V) stimulates microglial IL-18 synthesis.

Mammalian brain astrocytes and microglia express both IL-18 and IL-18 receptors [18-22], forming an integral part of both normal glia-neuron dialogue and brain tissue response to injury. Normal brain resident microglia increase the synthesis of IL-18 under conditions of infection, hypoxic-ischemic, and traumatic brain injuries, for example [23,24]. IL-18 is an important link in the development of both normal protective and pathological inflammation [25,26], among many other pathways, by promotion of interferon gamma synthesis and furthering Th1 helper T-cell development [27]. IL-18 is a core mediator of angiogenesis and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis pannus formation [28].

Proteolytic maturation is mediated by IL-1beta–converting enzyme (ICE), synonymous with caspase-1. Caspase-1 is a 60-kDa multimeric protease composed of two 20-kDa and two 10-kDa subunits. Caspase-1 itself is translated initially into a 45-kDa pro-caspase-1, appearing on the outer cell membrane [29,30].

IL-18 and cellular migration

Triggering migration is among the more prominent effects of exposing cells to IL-18. The migratory capacity of normal cardiac fibroblasts [31,32], normal macrophages [33], vessel wall transmigrating neutrophils [34], and coronary artery smooth muscle cells [35] increases in response to IL-18 exposure. Migration rate of normal human skin melanocytes increases after IL-18 exposure [36], as does that of dermal Langerhans cells [37] and murine melanoma cells [38,39].

IL-18–mediated increase in centrifugal migration was observed in gastric cancer cells [8,40] similar to what Yeh et al. [5] found in glioblastoma. Increased circulating IL-18 was observed in patients with gastric cancer [41], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [10], esophageal cancer [41], epithelial ovarian cancer [42], and non–small cell lung cancer [15,43] where higher levels of IL-18 were associated with poorer overall survival [13], in patients with breast cancer [44] where levels of IL-18 in metastatic disease were also higher than those in non-metastatic disease [45], and in patients with prostate cancer [14], small cell lung cancer [15], and pancreatic cancer where higher levels of IL-18 predicted poorer overall survival [46]. The common theme in these studies is that IL-18 increases most with metastatic disease. These findings, combined with IL-18–stimulated centrifugal migration in gastric cancer cells [8,40] and glioblastoma cells [5], point to IL-18 as a general mobility-enhancing signaling molecule for cancers.

A dramatic and instructive finding in this regard was reported by Jiang et al. [47] in 2003. In studying two subclones of the same human lung cancer cell line, one highly metastatic and the other poorly so, the authors concluded that robust IL-18 synthesis by the metastatic subclone was the determining factor in the different subclones’ behaviors, namely higher motility and metastatic competence in the higher IL-18–producing subclone.

Disulfiram and ritonavir

Disulfiram is a 297-Da aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor used clinically since the 1950s to treat alcoholism, and it is still widely used worldwide [48]. Ritonavir is a 721-Da antiviral drug, one of the first-generation protease inhibitors marketed in the 1980s to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [49].

Disulfiram and ritonavir form 2 of the 9-drug regimen to augment temozolomide in the coordinated undermining of survival paths 9 (CUSP9*) treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma. The rationale for these drugs was provided in the CUSP9 and CUSP9* papers [3,4], but it did not include considerations of the effects of disulfiram or ritonavir on IL-18. Detailed pharmacologic analysis in the CUSP9 papers indicated the unlikelihood of drug-drug interaction between either disulfiram or ritonavir or both and temozolomide [3,4]. What not discussed in these papers but reviewed here are additional data indicating that disulfiram and ritonavir can limit the maturation of pro–IL-18 and therefore be useful during primary Stupp protocol treatment.

The data showing the function of IL-18 in inhibiting the actions of disulfiram and ritonavir were previously reviewed in connection with their potential to mitigate inflammation associated with acute pancreatitis [50] or central nervous system (CNS) inflammation after blast exposure [51]. A study reported in 1997 showed potent caspase-1 inhibition by disulfiram [52], which would block pro–IL-18 maturation. Ritonavir decreases caspase-1 expression [53-55].

We have convincing evidence that both ritonavir and disulfiram or their active metabolites penetrate the blood–brain barrier effectively in sufficient concentrations [56-60]. The most common clinical use of disulfiram is to inhibit aldehyde dehydrogenase during the treatment of alcoholism [48]. A secondary use of disulfiram is to inhibit brain dopamine beta-hydroxylase during the treatment of certain addictions [56,57], thus indicating sufficient blood–brain penetration. The levels of ritonavir in the brain tissues and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tend to be low [58] when given orally, but can easily be increased from 2.4 to 6.6 ng/mL CSF with oral co-administration of ketoconazole [59]. We believe that these levels are sufficient based on in vitro studies and observations of CSF clearance of HIV with oral ritonavir [60].

Additional IL-18 considerations

Exogenous IL-18 is being investigated in several active research programs for its ability to stimulate immune responses to glioma cells [61-63]. Data indicating that IL-18 can enhance an anti-tumor immune response as well as being a trophic factor for many cancers were reviewed in 2007 by Park et al. [64]. Which factors predominate during human cancer progression remains unclear today. Given 1) the findings of Yeh et al. [5], which are concordant with a wealth of data on the active role of IL-18 in the dissemination of other cancers, and 2) the widely dispersed microsatellites within the brain tissues that go on to be fatal in glioblastoma, the safest supposition for now is that the net effect of IL-18 in glioblastoma is negative.

Thus, there is potential for the suggested combination of disulfiram and ritonavir to reduce an immune response to glioblastoma cells, but if the preponderant effect of IL-18 is to stimulate centrifugal migration, the net effect may well be clinically beneficial. Given the theoretical immunostimulatory aspect of IL-18 function, the paradox of finding increased circulating IL-18 as a negative prognostic portent has been discussed without resolution in the context of both pancreatic cancer [65] and breast cancer [66].

The 9-drug regimen CUSP9* designed for recurrent glioblastoma after Stupp protocol treatment [3] already includes both disulfiram and ritonavir for reasons that do not include IL-18 inhibition. Given the likely centrifugal migration driven by IL-18 and unlikely additional adverse effect burden of adding concurrent disulfiram and ritonavir, we have the potential to improve initial treatment with the Stupp protocol [1,2], temozolomide, and irradiation after maximal surgical resection.

In vitro irradiation of microglia increases their IL-18 synthesis [67]. In vivo brain irradiation up-regulates microglial IL-18 synthesis in situ and increases the number of IL-18–producing microglia [68]. Of particular note, irradiation-induced increased microglial IL-18 is not transient and may indeed be permanent [68]. Indeed, low-dose, whole body irradiation dose proportionately increases circulating IL-18 in mice, pigs, and non-human primates [69]. Thus, as part of the standard Stupp protocol for initial treatment of glioblastoma, in addition to killing much of the primary tumor mass and consequently somewhat lengthening overall survival, irradiation can be expected to stimulate IL-18–driven centrifugal migration of the few surviving glioblastoma cells. Stimulating the centrifugal migration of glioblastoma cells leads to their wide dissemination and sets up conditions for later fatal recurrence, the classic double-edged sword. Disulfiram and ritonavir may have potential to overcome the pathophysiology of glioblastoma and improve the results of the Stupp protocol as currently constituted.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated how a feed-forward, IL-18–based, growth-enhancing system forms an element of glioblastoma pathophysiology whereby glioblastoma cells secrete extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, and these proteins then stimulate surrounding normal brain microglia to secrete increased IL-18 [5]. The accumulation of IL-18 stimulates centrifugal glioblastoma cell migration and then stimulates a new set of microglia at the growing front to synthesize IL-18. These centrifugally migrating cells ultimately prove to be untreatable and fatal.

Two old, well-tolerated, low-risk drugs, disulfiram and ritonavir, have been shown to interfere with IL-18 generation/function, but with little evidence that they would increase the burden of adverse effects or interfere with Stupp protocol interventions, temozolomide, and radiation. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio favors adding concomitant disulfiram and ritonavir to the standard Stupp protocol.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This was unfunded research.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
International Initiative for Accelerated Improvement of Glioblastoma Care Study Center

References

  1. Villa S, Balana C, Comas S. Radiation and concomitant chemotherapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33(1):25–31.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kast RE, Karpel-Massler G, Halatsch ME. CUSP9* treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma: aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, ritonavir, sertraline augmenting continuous low dose temozolomide. Oncotarget. 2014;5(18):8052–82.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kast RE, Boockvar JA, Brüning A, Cappello F, Chang WW, Cvek B, et al. A conceptually new treatment approachfor relapsed glioblastoma: coordinated undermining of survival paths with nine repurposed drugs (CUSP9) by the International Initiative for Accelerated Improvement of Glioblastoma Care. Oncotarget. 2013;4(4):502–30.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yeh WL, Lu DY, Liou HC, Fu WM. A forward loop between glioma and microglia: glioma-derived extracellular matrix-activated microglia secrete IL-18 to enhance the migration of glioma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):558–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Christofides A, Kosmopoulos M, Piperi C. Pathophysiological mechanisms regulated by cytokines in gliomas. Cytokine. 2014;71(2):377–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Qian CN, Zhang W. Outsmarting cancer: an international brainstorm in Guangzhou. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30(8):505–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim KE, Song H, Hahm C, Yoon SY, Park S, Lee HR, et al. Expression of ADAM33 is a novel regulatory mechanism in IL-18-secreted process in gastric cancer. J Immunol. 2009;182(6):3548–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Martone T, Bellone G, Pagano M, Beatrice F, Palonta F, Emanuelli G, et al. Constitutive expression of interleukin-18 in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Head Neck. 2004;26(6):494–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Riedel F, Adam S, Feick P, Haas S, Götte K, Hörmann K, et al. Expression of IL-18 in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2004;13(2):267–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carbone A, Rodeck U, Mauri FA, Sozzi M, Gaspari F, Smirne C, et al. Human pancreatic carcinoma cells secrete bioactive interleukin-18 after treatment with 5-fluorouracil: implications for anti-tumor immune response. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4(2):231–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang ZY, Gaggero A, Rubartelli A, Rosso O, Miotti S, Mezzanzanica D, et al. Expression of interleukin-18 in human ovarian carcinoma and normal ovarian epithelium: evidence for defective processing in tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(6):873–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Okamoto M, Azuma K, Hoshino T, Imaoka H, Ikeda J, Kinoshita T, et al. Correlation of decreased survival and IL-18 in bone metastasis. Intern Med. 2009;48(10):763–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dwivedi S, Goel A, Natu SM, Mandhani A, Khattri S, Pant KK. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of prostate specific antigen and serum interleukin 18 and 10 in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospective study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(7):1843–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rovina N, Hillas G, Dima E, Vlastos F, Loukides S, Veldekis D, et al. VEGF and IL-18 in induced sputum of lung cancer patients. Cytokine. 2011;54(3):277–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang Y, Li Y, Ma Y, Liu S, She Y, Zhao P, et al. Dual effects of interleukin-18: inhibiting hepatitis B virus replication in HepG2.2.15 cells and promoting hepatoma cells metastasis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301(3):G565–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crende O, Sabatino M, Valcárcel M, Carrascal T, Riestra P, López-Guerrero JA, et al. Metastatic lesions with and without interleukin-18-dependent genes in advanced-stage melanoma patients. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(1):69–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen ML, Cao H, Chu YX, Cheng LZ, Liang LL, Zhang YQ, et al. Role of P2X7 receptor-mediated IL-18/IL-18R signaling in morphine tolerance: multiple glial-neuronal dialogues in the rat spinal cord. J Pain. 2012;13(10):945–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeon GS, Park SK, Park SW, Kim DW, Chung CK, Cho SS. Glial expression of interleukin-18 and its receptor after excitotoxic damage in the mouse hippocampus. Neurochem Res. 2008;33(1):179–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Andre R, Wheeler RD, Collins PD, Luheshi GN, Pickering-Brown S, Kimber I, et al. Identification of a truncated IL-18R beta mRNA: a putative regulator of IL-18 expressed in rat brain. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;145(1–2):40–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wheeler RD, Culhane AC, Hall MD, Pickering-Brown S, Rothwell NJ, Luheshi GN. Detection of the interleukin 18 family in rat brain by RT-PCR. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000;77(2):290–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zorrilla EP, Conti B. Interleukin-18 null mutation increases weight and food intake and reduces energy expenditure and lipid substrate utilization in high-fat diet fed mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;37:45–53.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Alboni S, Cervia D, Sugama S, Conti B. Interleukin 18 in the CNS. J Neuroinflammation. 2010;7:9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Felderhoff-Mueser U, Schmidt OI, Oberholzer A, Bührer C, Stahel PF. IL-18: a key player in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration? Trends Neurosci. 2005;28(9):487–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dinarello CA, Fantuzzi G. Interleukin-18 and host defense against infection. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:S370–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Montero MT, Matilla J, Gómez-Mampaso E, Lasunción MA. Geranylgeraniol regulates negatively caspase-1 autoprocessing: implication in the Th1 response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2004;173(8):4936–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kashiwamura S, Ueda H, Okamura H. Roles of interleukin-18 in tissue destruction and compensatory reactions. J Immunother. 2002;25:S4–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Volin MV, Koch AE. Interleukin-18: a mediator of inflammation and angiogenesis in rheumatoidarthritis. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(10):745–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Singer II, Scott S, Chin J, Bayne EK, Limjuco G, Weidner J, et al. The interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme (ICE) is localized on the external cell surface membranes and in the cytoplasmic ground substance of human monocytes by immuno-electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1995;182(5):1447–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ayala JM, Yamin TT, Egger LA, Chin J, Kostura MJ, Miller DK. IL-1 beta-converting enzyme is present in monocytic cells as an inactive 45-kDa precursor. J Immunol. 1994;153(6):2592–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Siddesha JM, Valente AJ, Sakamuri SS, Gardner JD, Delafontaine P, Noda M, et al. Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits IL-18-induced cardiac fibroblast migration through the induction of RECK. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229(7):845–55.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Valente AJ, Sakamuri SS, Siddesha JM, Yoshida T, Gardner JD, Prabhu R, et al. TRAF3IP2 mediates interleukin-18-induced cardiac fibroblast migration and differentiation. Cell Signal. 2013;25(11):2176–84.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez-Menocal L, Faridi MH, Martinez L, Shehadeh LA, Duque JC, Wei Y, et al. Macrophage-derived IL-18 and increased fibrinogen deposition are age-related inflammatory signatures of vascular remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014;306(5):H641–53.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lapointe TK, Buret AG. Interleukin-18 facilitates neutrophil transmigration via myosin light chain kinase-dependent disruption of occludin, without altering epithelial permeability. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302(3):G343–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Valente AJ, Yoshida T, Izadpanah R, Delafontaine P, Siebenlist U, Chandrasekar B. Interleukin-18 enhances IL-18R/Nox1 binding, and mediates TRAF3IP2-dependent smooth muscle cell migration. Inhibition by simvastatin. Cell Signal. 2013;25(6):1447–56.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou J, Shang J, Song J, Ping F. Interleukin-18 augments growth ability of primary human melanocytes by PTEN inactivation through the AKT/NF-kappaB pathway. J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(2):308–16.Google Scholar
  37. Cumberbatch M, Dearman RJ, Antonopoulos C, Groves RW, Kimber I. Interleukin (IL)-18 induces Langerhans cell migration by a tumour necrosis factor-alpha- and IL-1beta-dependent mechanism. Immunology. 2001;102(3):323–30.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Song H, Kim J, Lee HK, Park HJ, Nam J, Park GB, et al. Selenium inhibits migration of murine melanoma cells via down-modulation of IL-18 expression. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(12):2208–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jung MK, Song HK, Kim KE, Hur DY, Kim T, Bang S, et al. IL-18 enhances the migration ability of murine melanoma cells through the generation of ROI and the MAPK pathway. Immunol Lett. 2006;107(2):125–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kang JS, Bae SY, Kim HR, Kim YS, Kim DJ, Cho BJ, et al. Interleukin-18 increases metastasis and immune escape of stomach cancer via the downregulation of CD70 and maintenance of CD44. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(12):1987–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Diakowska D, Markocka-Maczka K, Grabowski K, Lewandowski A. Serum interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 levels in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Oncol. 2006;28(4):319–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Samsami Dehaghani A, Shahriary K, Kashef MA, Naeimi S, Fattahi MJ, Mojtahedi Z, et al. Interleukin-18 gene promoter and serum level in women with ovarian cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2009;36(8):2393–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Naumnik W, Chyczewska E, Kovalchuk O, Tałałaj J, Izycki T, Panek B. Serum levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) in lung cancer. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2004;49:246–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Coskun U, Gunel N, Sancak B, Onuk E, Bayram M, Cihan A. Effect of tamoxifen on serum IL-18, vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide activities in breast carcinoma patients. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;137(3):546–51.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Eissa SA, Zaki SA, El-Maghraby SM, Kadry DY. Importance of serum IL-18 and RANTES as markers for breast carcinoma progression. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005;17(1):51–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bellone G, Smirne C, Mauri FA, Tonel E, Carbone A, Buffolino A, et al. Cytokine expression profile in human pancreatic carcinoma cells and in surgical specimens: implications for survival. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55(6):684–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jiang D, Ying W, Lu Y, Wan J, Zhai Y, Liu W, et al. Identification of metastasis-associated proteins by proteomic analysis and functional exploration of interleukin-18 in metastasis. Proteomics. 2003;3(5):724–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ellis PM, Dronsfield AT. Antabuse's diamond anniversary: still sparkling on? Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32(4):342–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lea AP, Faulds D. Ritonavir Drugs. 1996;52(4):541–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kast RE. Ritonavir and disulfiram may be synergistic in lowering active interleukin-18 levels in acute pancreatitis, and thereby hasten recovery. JOP. 2008;9(3):350–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Foley K, Kast RE, Altschuler EL. Ritonavir and disulfiram have potential to inhibit caspase-1 mediated inflammation and reduce neurological sequelae after minor blast exposure. Med Hypotheses. 2009;72(2):150–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nobel CS, Kimland M, Nicholson DW, Orrenius S, Slater AF. Disulfiram is a potent inhibitor of proteases of the caspase family. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10(12):1319–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sloand EM, Maciejewski J, Kumar P, Kim S, Chaudhuri A, Young N. Protease inhibitors stimulate hematopoiesis and decrease apoptosis and ICE expression in CD34(+) cells. Blood. 2000;96(8):2735–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sloand EM, Kumar PN, Kim S, Chaudhuri A, Weichold FF, Young NS. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor modulates activation of peripheral blood CD4(+) T cells and decreases their susceptibility to apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 1999;94(3):1021–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Weichold FF, Bryant JL, Pati S, Barabitskaya O, Gallo RC, Reitz Jr MS. HIV-1 protease inhibitor ritonavir modulates susceptibility to apoptosis of uninfected T cells. J Hum Virol. 1999;2(5):261–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cooper DA, Kimmel HL, Manvich DF, Schmidt KT, Weinshenker D, Howell LL. Effects of pharmacologic dopamine β-hydroxylase inhibition on cocaine-induced reinstatement and dopamine neurochemistry in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;350(1):144–52.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Gaval-Cruz M, Weinshenker D. mechanisms of disulfiram-induced cocaine abstinence: antabuse and cocaine relapse. Mol Interv. 2009;9(4):175–87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kravcik S, Gallicano K, Roth V, Cassol S, Hawley-Foss N, Badley A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA and drug levels with combination ritonavir and saquinavir. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;21(5):371–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Khaliq Y, Gallicano K, Venance S, Kravcik S, Cameron DW. Effect of ketoconazole on ritonavir and saquinavir concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68(6):637–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lafeuillade A, Solas C, Halfon P, Chadapaud S, Hittinger G, Lacarelle B. Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: clinical correlations. HIV Clin Trials. 2002;3(1):27–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu G, Jiang XD, Xu Y, Zhang J, Huang FH, Chen ZZ, et al. Adenoviral-mediated interleukin-18 expression in mesenchymal stem cells effectively suppresses the growth of glioma in rats. Cell Biol Int. 2009;33(4):466–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lagarce F, Garcion E, Faisant N, Thomas O, Kanaujia P, Menei P, et al. Development and characterization of interleukin-18-loaded biodegradable microspheres. Int J Pharm. 2006;314(2):88.Google Scholar
  63. Kito T, Kuroda E, Yokota A, Yamashita U. Cytotoxicity in glioma cells due to interleukin-12 and interleukin-18-stimulated macrophages mediated by interferon-gamma-regulated nitric oxide. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(2):385–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Park S, Cheon S, Cho D. The dual effects of interleukin-18 in tumor progression. Cell Mol Immunol. 2007;4(5):329–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Carbone A, Vizio B, Novarino A, Mauri FA, Geuna M, Robino C, et al. IL-18 paradox in pancreatic carcinoma: elevated serum levels of free IL-18 are correlated with poor survival. J Immunother. 2009;32(9):920–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Metwally FM, El-mezayen HA, Ahmed HH. Significance of vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-18 and nitric oxide in patients with breast cancer: correlation with carbohydrate antigen 15.3. Med Oncol. 2011;28:S15–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hwang SY, Jung JS, Kim TH, Lim SJ, Oh ES, Kim JY, et al. Ionizing radiation induces astrocyte gliosis through microglia activation. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21(3):457–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhu C, Huang Z, Gao J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Karlsson N, et al. Irradiation to the immature brain attenuates neurogenesis and exacerbates subsequent hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the adult. J Neurochem. 2009;111(6):1447–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ha CT, Li XH, Fu D, Moroni M, Fisher C, Arnott R, et al. Circulating interleukin-18 as a biomarker of total-body radiation exposure in mice, minipigs, and nonhuman primates (NHP). PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109249.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kast; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement