Open Access

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation versus hepatectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Contributed equally
Chinese Journal of Cancer201534:22

DOI: 10.1186/s40880-015-0023-9

Received: 14 August 2014

Accepted: 9 April 2015

Published: 10 June 2015

Abstract

Introduction

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus thermal ablation has been widely used recently in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to compare results of the combination of TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation with those of hepatectomy in patients with HCC.

Methods

The clinical data of 137 HCC patients who sequentially received TACE and computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous thermal ablation as an initial curative treatment (combination group) and 148 matched HCC patients who received hepatectomy (surgery group) between 2004 and 2011 were collected and analyzed. After TACE, multiphase contrast-enhanced CT was performed to identify the total number of tumors as well as lipiodol deposition in the liver. Survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. The prognostic factors were assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

Of all 285 patients, 225 (79.0 %) had cancerous lesions ≤ 5 cm in diameter. In preoperative contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging, the number of tumors was 1–4 for each patient. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 95, 74 %, and 67 % in the combination group and 88, 66, and 47 % in the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.004); the corresponding recurrence-free survival rates for the two groups were 92, 69, and 61 % and 75, 58, and 44 %, respectively (P = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, treatment allocation was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Only 60 patients in the combination group had sufficient imaging data, and 135 new lesions with lipiodol deposition were diagnosed as malignancies in 22 of 60 patients, whereas 20 new lesions were found in 11 of 148 patients in the surgery group.

Conclusion

The combination of TACE and CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation for HCC improves survival of HCC patients compared with hepatectomy.

Keywords

Percutaneous thermal ablation Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization hepatectomy Hepatocellular carcinoma Survival

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and is a primary contributor to cancer-related death in the world; new treatment modalities are needed to improve the survival of HCC patients [13].

Although hepatectomy is an effective treatment for HCC, it is also invasive and not always repeatable. For HCC smaller than 2 cm in diameter, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) achieved the same efficacy as surgery [4]. As a preoperative examination, lipiodol computed tomography (CT) also contributes to the detection of additional liver lesions after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) [57].

The combination of TACE and RFA improves the survival of HCC patients compared with RFA alone [8]. However, few studies have compared the results of TACE plus thermal ablation with those of hepatectomy in patients with comparable characteristics [9]. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of TACE combined with CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation and hepatectomy as the initial curative treatment for resectable HCC.

Patients and Methods

Patient selection and patient characteristics

This comparative study collected and retrospectively analyzed the patient characteristics from our electronic medical database. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Contrast-enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common imaging techniques for the diagnosis of HCC. The number of tumors and tumor size were comparable between the two groups, as observed via preoperative imaging. The tumor number and tumor size were assessed by using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI prior to TACE or hepatectomy; however, additional HCCs that were detected via lipiodol CT or pathologic examination were not included. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT was performed with a 16-detector row scanner (Brilliance 16, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) or a 64-detector row CT scanner (Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). MRI examination was performed with a 1.5-T MR system (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with an 18-channel body surface phased-array coil. MRI scan was also performed with a 3 T whole-body scanner (Tim Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in some patients by using the body coil to transmit radiofrequency pulses and a 12-channel phased-array head coil to receive signals. The liver was imaged in at least the axial plane in all patients, and the gadoxetic acid (Primovist, Bayer Schering Pharma, Germany) was administrated at a dose of 0.1 mL/kg through the antecubital vein.

The diagnosis of HCC was based on the criteria used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver [10]: (1) two imaging techniques showing typical features of HCC, (2) positive findings on one imaging study together with an alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level of > 400 ng/mL, or (3) a histological diagnosis of HCC.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients at 18–75 years old; (2) patients with HCC of 1–10 cm in diameter and 1–4 lesions in preoperative imaging (prior to TACE or surgery); (3) patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1; (4) patients with liver function Child-Pugh A or B; and (5) patients without portal vein tumor thrombus, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with other malignancies; (2) patients with liver function Child-Pugh C; (3) patients with less than 3 months of life expectancy or follow-up; (4) patients with uncontrolled severe diabetes, acute infection, or allergy to iodine; or (5) patients with a bleeding tendency (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio [PT-INR] > 2.5 or platelet < 50 × 109) or severe jaundice (total bilirubin > 170 μmol/L).

A total of 137 patients who received TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation (combination group) as well as 148 patients who received hepatectomy (surgery group) between January 2004 and December 2011 were involved (Fig. 1). The patients in the surgery group were selected from more than 10,000 HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy to match the patients in the combination group and reduce confounding factors. The patients in the two groups were matched according to age, sex, tumor size, tumor number, liver function, and other factors prior to TACE or surgery (Table 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40880-015-0023-9/MediaObjects/40880_2015_23_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Chart showing the treatment strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; CT, computed tomography

Table 1

Comparison of the clinical parameters between the two groups of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Matched variable

Combination group (n = 137)

Surgery group (n = 148)

P

Age (years)

  

0.093

  Median

51

54

 

  Range

23–74

23–75

 

Sexa

  

0.183

  Male

129

133

 

  Female

8

15

 

Hypersplenisma

  

0.281

  Yes

74

70

 

  No

63

78

 

Child-Pugh classa

  

0.193

  A

124

140

 

  B

13

8

 

Cirrhosisa

  

0.432

  Yes

118

132

 

  No

19

16

 

Diabetes mellitusa

  

0.296

  No

118

134

 

  Yes

19

14

 

Tumor numbera

  

0.582

  1

59

69

 

  2

43

50

 

  3

28

21

 

  4

7

8

 

Tumor sizea

  

0.992

  ≤3 cm

61

68

 

  >3 cm and ≤5 cm

47

49

 

  >5 cm and ≤7 cm

23

24

 

  >7 cm and ≤10 cm

6

7

 

Alpha fetoproteina

  

0.292

  ≥400 ng/mL

34

45

 

  <400 ng/mL

103

103

 

Size of all nodules in diameter (cm)

  

0.364

  Median

3.8

4.0

 

  Mean ± standard deviation

37.0 ± 17.5

38.9 ± 18.1

 

Albumin (g/L)

40.8 ± 4.3

41.6 ± 4.2

0.133

Prothrombin time (s)

12.6 ± 2.0

13.0 ± 2.1

0.075

Platelet count (×109/L)

128.2 ± 64.8

145.1 ± 60.0

0.022

Hemoglobin (g/L)

135.9 ± 16.2

138.7 ± 16.8

0.156

CA19-9 (U/mL)

140.4 ± 852.2

79.8 ± 531.0

0.469

aThe values are presented as number of patients. Tumor size, the largest lesion in diameter.

Treatments

TACE and lipiodol CT

TACE was performed prior to ablation and by following previously described techniques [11]. The volume of lipiodol and the dose of chemotherapeutics depended on the volume and blood supply of the targeted tumor, as well as the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and liver function of the patients. The emulsion of 5–15 mL of lipiodol, 40–60 mg of epirubicin, 4 mg of mitomycin C, 200–400 mg of carboplatin, and 3 mL of saline solution was infused through the target hepatic arteries, without retrograde flow. Two weeks to 1 month after TACE, baseline CT and multiphase (arterial, portal, and delayed phases) contrast-enhanced CT (lipiodol CT) were performed to identify the total number of tumors as well as lipiodol deposition in the liver. We then treated all confirmed cancerous lesions. The tiny HCC was defined as tumors ≤ 5 mm in diameter.

For lipiodol deposition in the liver, we first excluded calcification, intrahepatic calculi, hemangioma, patchy lipiodol, hypervascular focal nodular hyperplasia, and satellite lesions within the primary lesion. Tiny HCC with lipiodol deposition was confirmed by at least two radiologists in our department who each had more than 4 years of experience in radiology. According to perioperative CT or MRI, the radiologists focused on detecting tiny HCC. Follow-up CT and/or MRI scans, AFP test, and PET-CT were used to differentiate lesions with lipiodol deposition or high CT value if necessary. Any disagreement in the diagnosis was settled by consulting with other experienced radiologists in our department.

Percutaneous thermal ablation

CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation included RFA and microwave ablation in our study. The anesthetic techniques consisted of a combination of local anesthesia (1 % lidocaine), intravenous benzodiazepine (1.0–2.5 mg of midazolam), and propofol (2–2.5 mg/kg). The dose of anesthetic was adjusted according to the intraoperative situation. Percutaneous ablation was performed according to our routine protocol. The parameters of ablation, including ablation power, ablation time, and number of electrodes, were adjusted according to the manufacturer’s instructions, operator’s experience, and intraoperative CT evaluation.

For tumors more than 5 cm in diameter, we usually chose microwave ablation for HCC treatment; for tumors less than or equal to 5 cm, we used RFA. Most patients (78.9 %, 225 of 285) had cancerous lesions less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter. Complete ablation was assessed using intraoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced CT (Fig. 2), and additional ablation was added if necessary. Five patients received palliative ablation in the combination group due to multiple lesions in the liver that were detected via subsequent lipiodol CT.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40880-015-0023-9/MediaObjects/40880_2015_23_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

Perioperative imaging of patients with HCC. a and b, viable lesions are not shown in different segments of the liver via preoperative CT. c and d, it is very difficult to locate viable lesions in segments 6 and 7 of the liver via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. e and f, two additional tiny lesions with lipiodol depositions were detected in segments 6 and 7 of the liver (arrows) by using lipiodol CT after TACE. g and h, two cancerous lesions were treated with radiofrequency ablation

Hepatic resection

Hepatic resection was carried out under general anesthesia, and 4 experienced surgeons at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center performed these procedures. Intraoperative ultrasound was routinely used to evaluate other possible tumors, the remnant liver, and the possibility of a negative resection margin; the surgeon then searched for new lesions. Various methods of hepatic resection were adopted according to the scenario. After the operation, pathologic examination was performed for all excised specimens to confirm diagnosis and complete resection, which was considered the absence of microscopic tumor invasion and negative resection margins. Three patients were found to have incomplete resections due to new lesions detected during hepatectomy.

The treatment principal after recurrence was similar between the two groups. Hepatectomy, TACE, percutaneous thermal ablation, or conservative treatment was selectively performed in cases of recurrence depending on tumor location, tumor size, tumor number, liver function, and the general condition of the patient. For early recurrent HCC, either hepatectomy or RFA was performed according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification [12]. For unresectable recurrent HCC, palliative TACE, thermal ablation, or best supportive treatment was given. Recurrent patients who were not treated according to the above treatment principals were excluded from the surgery group.

Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of diagnosis of HCC to the date of death or last follow-up. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the interval between the time of diagnosis of HCC to the last follow-up or the time when a recurrent/residual tumor was diagnosed. Patients lost to follow-up were censored on the last follow-up day. The last follow-up date was March 1, 2014.

Statistical analysis

The categorical characteristics were summarized and are presented as proportion and frequencies. The continuous variables are expressed as the mean values ± standard deviation, median values, or number of patients. Continuous data were compared between the two groups by using the independent t test, and categorical variables were compared by using Pearson’s chi-square test or Yates’s correction for continuity. Survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The independent prognostic factors in predicting survival were assessed by using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

Survival analysis

The mean follow-up duration was 43.4 ± 25.9 (median, 39.1) months, and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95 %, 74 %, and 67 % for the combination group and 88 %, 66 %, and 47 % for the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 92 %, 69 %, and 61 % for the combination group and 75 %, 58 %, and 44 % for the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.001) (Fig. 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40880-015-0023-9/MediaObjects/40880_2015_23_Fig3_HTML.gif
Fig. 3

Comparison of survival between the combination group and surgery group of HCC patients. a, the combination of TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation improved the overall survival of patients with HCC compared with hepatectomy. b, the combination of TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation improved the recurrence-free survival of patients with HCC compared with hepatectomy

In the multivariate analysis, treatment allocation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.810, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.215–2.697, P = 0.004), albumin level (HR = 1.819, 95 % CI = 1.233–2.685, P = 0.003), tumor size (HR = 1.732, 95 % CI = 1.160–2.587, P = 0.007), and tumor number (HR = 1.401, 95 % CI = 1.143–1.718, P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS (Table 2). Treatment allocation (HR = 1.999, 95 % CI = 1.341–2.980, P = 0.001), albumin level (HR = 1.723, 95 % CI = 1.167–2.543, P = 0.006), tumor size (HR = 1.877, 95 % CI = 1.255–2.806, P = 0.002), and tumor number (HR = 1.359, 95 % CI = 1.114–1.658, P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors for RFS (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the 285 HCC patients

Variable

Number of patients

OS (months)

P

RFS (months)

P

Age

  

0.879

 

0.921

  <65 years

238

79.4 ± 4.6

 

72.4 ± 4.6

 

  ≥65 years

47

77.9 ± 8.6

 

73.4 ± 9.4

 

Sex

  

0.163

 

0.141

  Male

262

83.0 ± 4.3

 

76.4 ± 4.2

 

  Female

23

54.0 ± 7.2

 

47.5 ± 8.1

 

Cirrhosis

  

0.911

 

0.806

  Yes

250

80.4 ± 4.4

 

73.7 ± 4.3

 

  No

35

67.6 ± 8.3

 

64.1 ± 8.8

 

Treatment allocation

  

0.012

 

0.004

  Combinationa

137

91.2 ± 6.1

 

84.1 ± 6.0

 

  Surgery

148

61.7 ± 3.8

 

57.1 ± 4.3

 

Tumor number

  

<0.001

 

<0.001

  1

128

80.4 ± 5.0

 

66.7 ± 3.9

 

  2

93

73.3 ± 6.8

 

69.8 ± 7.2

 

  3

49

82.2 ± 9.5

 

75.3 ± 8.6

 

  4

15

31.8 ± 10.0

 

26.6 ± 7.7

 

CA19-9

  

0.088

 

0.093

  Positive

113

71.0 ± 5.8

 

68.0 ± 6.1

 

  Negative

172

84.1 ± 5.5

 

74.1 ± 4.9

 

Alpha fetoprotein

  

0.004

 

0.002

  ≥400 ng/mL

79

60.6 ± 6.7

 

56.6 ± 7.1

 

  <400 ng/mL

206

87.2 ± 4.8

 

79.2 ± 4.5

 

Albumin

  

0.003

 

0.014

  ≥40 g/L

174

87.4 ± 5.4

 

76.8 ± 4.9

 

  <40 g/L

111

65.3 ± 5.9

 

62.5 ± 6.2

 

Prothrombin time

  

0.018

 

0.011

  ≤13.5 s

217

85.0 ± 4.9

 

78.2 ± 4.8

 

  >13.5 s

68

63.0 ± 6.8

 

58.2 ± 7.4

 

Platelet count

  

0.417

 

0.604

  ≥100 × 109/L

200

82.5 ± 4.9

 

74.0 ± 4.6

 

  <100 × 109/L

85

72.1 ± 6.9

 

9.0 ± 7.5

 

Hemoglobin

  

0.456

 

0.239

  ≥120 × 1012/L

247

81.6 ± 4.4

 

75.5 ± 4.2

 

  <120 × 1012/L

38

67.9 ± 9.3

 

51.6 ± 7.9

 

Maximal tumor size

  

0.009

 

0.004

  ≤3 cm

130

95.0 ± 5.4

 

88.2 ± 5.3

 

  >3 cm

155

65.8 ± 4.8

 

56.1 ± 4.3

 

Hypersplenism

  

0.941

 

0.668

  Yes

144

79.4 ± 6.2

 

73.6 ± 5.9

 

  No

141

76.0 ± 5.0

 

71.8 ± 5.4

 

All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. aCombination treatment includes ablation and hepatectomy.

Complications

Complications are shown in Table 3. More blood loss and longer hospital stay were observed in the surgery group than in the combination group. Major complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. Hemoglobin level decreased more significantly in the surgery group than in the combination group (P < 0.001).
Table 3

Procedure-related events in the two groups of HCC patients

Variable

Combination group

Surgery group

P

Major complications (cases [%])

2 (1.5 %)

3 (2.0 %)

0.716

Bleeding volume (mL)

19.4 ± 42.0

327.0 ± 322.8

<0.001

Transfusion (mL)

5.1 ± 45.9

31.4 ± 114.8

0.013

HB decrease (mL)

8.9 ± 15.0

18.3 ± 15.6

<0.001

Hospital stay (days)

11.5 ± 6.9

18.7 ± 4.9

<0.001

The italic numbers reflected P value which was < 0.05

Additional tumors detected

Only 60 of the 137 patients in the combination group had sufficient imaging data to confirm tiny HCC in the liver. A total of 135 lesions with lipiodol deposition were diagnosed as new HCC lesions in 22 of 60 patients via lipiodol CT after TACE, as confirmed by radiologists in our team (Fig. 4). Twenty new lesions were found in 11 of 148 patients in the surgery group, as postoperatively confirmed via pathologic examination. Newly diagnosed tumors were ≤ 5 mm in diameter in the combination group whereas ≤ 10 mm in diameter in the surgery group.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40880-015-0023-9/MediaObjects/40880_2015_23_Fig4_HTML.gif
Fig. 4

Multiple tiny lesions detected by lipiodol CT. a, no cancerous lesions were detected in contrast-enhanced CT prior to TACE. b, multiple tiny lesions with lipiodol depositions (as shown in arrows) were detected by using lipiodol CT after TACE in the same patient

Discussion and conclusions

Surgery for resectable HCC has been widely used for many years. As new imaging techniques and technology advances, imaging-guided minimally invasive therapies for liver cancer have undergone rapid developments due to their efficacy and minimal invasiveness [13].

Our present study indicated that the combination of TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation improved the survival of patients with HCC compared with hepatectomy. The treatment modality was an independent prognostic factor for survival. TACE plus RFA can be used to achieve complete targeted HCC lesion necrosis; long-term survival has also been reported [14, 15]. TACE alone was reported to be comparable with RFA or hepatectomy for small single HCC [16]. Thus, TACE combined with RFA was possibly curative. Takuma et al. [9] found comparable OS rates between the two groups, and disease-free survival was superior in the surgery group than in the combination group. However, CT was performed 1 day after RFA, and there was no lipiodol CT imaging. Thus, additional tiny HCCs may not have been identified and treated in this study. Tashiro et al. [14] reported similar survival rates between the two therapies for patients with HCC ≤ 2 cm in diameter. However, for patients with a single Child-Pugh class A HCC larger than 2 cm in diameter, the disease-free survival time was significantly longer in the subgroup of hepatectomy than in the subgroup of RFA. Kim et al. [17] concluded that for a single HCC (2 to 5 cm in diameter), RFA combined with TACE resulted in a survival time similar to that of patients undergoing hepatectomy. For patients with early-stage HCC, Kagawa et al. [18] also stated that the OS rates of patients treated with RFA combined with TACE were similar to those of patients treated with hepatectomy.

We believe that combining TACE with percutaneous thermal ablation is beneficial. First, it is difficult to diagnose all of the tiny HCCs with routine contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. AFP level was significantly elevated in some patients; however, cancerous lesions cannot always be detected in imaging of these patients. We had to follow up until these lesions became apparent. When these tiny lesions coexist with benign lesions, it is more difficult to detect them using only AFP fluctuation. Second, during hepatectomy, it is difficult for the surgeon to detect very tiny lesions despite the routine use of intraoperative ultrasound. Some tiny HCCs were occasionally found in different segments, and these lesions were also difficult to take biopsy. Thus, they were less likely to be detected during hepatectomy. We only found 20 additional HCCs in the 148 patients in the surgery group. Third, subsequent lipiodol CT can be used to detect additional tiny HCCs with lipiodol deposition [6]. TACE combined with RFA was superior to RFA alone in prolonging patient survival, and the efficacy of TACE on HCC detection and treatment has been demonstrated [8]. Microvascular invasion with satellite lesions is an unfavorable prognostic factor for HCC [19]; however, tiny HCC and satellite lesions can be detected on lipiodol CT and then treated. TACE is useful for treating multiple lesions within different lobes, usually with incomplete necrosis. Complete necrosis can be achieved after thermal ablation, especially for local tumors. This explains why TACE combined with thermal ablation prolongs survival compared with hepatectomy. Fourth, HCC tends to relapse in a multi-centric manner. The vast majority of patients with HCC in China have hepatitis B virus infection and/or cirrhosis, which remain in the remnant liver after treatment. These factors limited the repeated use of hepatectomy for recurrent patients. Percutaneous thermal ablation, which is highly repeatable and less invasive to the liver parenchyma [20], more thoroughly preserves the liver parenchyma and is suitable for recurrent patients with poor performance status and cirrhosis.

New lesions were detected in only one-tenth of all patients and were found in 36.7 % of the 60 patients with complete data in our study. Additional cancerous lesions were not confirmed in the other 77 patients of the combination group; however, those lesions were ablated or closely followed up. Tiny lesions can be detected earlier and effectively treated with TACE and lipiodol CT in the combination group. Thus, this modality may provide a survival benefit. The surgery group had complete pathologic data; however, additional cancerous lesions were only identified in 11 of the 148 patients; any other non-detected lesions would lead to disease progression in the other 137 patients. Lipiodol CT was not performed in these patients, and many tiny lesions may not be identified. This may influence the efficacy of surgery because surgeons have difficulty in locating tiny HCCs in this circumstance. Thus, more tiny HCCs can be detected and treated by combining TACE with thermal ablation. Prior to resection or local ablation, neoadjuvant therapies are not recommended for HCC by some European experts [21]. According to our study, after TACE, lipiodol CT assists in the detection of additional cancerous lesions that were missed on routine contrast-enhanced CT or MRI imaging.

Tumor number and size were important factors in TNM staging and were independent prognostic factors in our study as well as in other studies [2224]. There was no difference in preoperative maximal tumor size between two groups. In the combination group, more lesions were detected after TACE, and the total tumor number increased more substantially; thus, the mean tumor size became smaller. In the combination group, only 60 patients with sufficient imaging data were available for the discovery and confirmation of new lesions with lipiodol deposition; new tiny lesions in the other 77 patients were not confirmed as malignancies. In the surgery group, the pathologic data were complete and cancerous lesions were confirmed for all patients. However, lipiodol CT was not performed for these patients prior to surgery, thereby potentially leaving tiny HCCs undetected. Thus, the real mean size in the combination group was not definitively smaller than that in the surgery group.

Additionally, maximal tumor size affects TNM staging After TACE, the maximal tumor size in the combination group changed and the total tumor number increased. However, the maximal tumor size in the hepatectomy group was stable. Thus, we only provide a preoperative maximal tumor size for the survival analysis. Moreover, some cancerous lesions were undetected and unconfirmed in both groups. These lesions were later identified with differing methods, and only some additional lesions were confirmed. The median size of all of the tumors is thus not given.

After TACE, newly diagnosed lesions with lipiodol deposition on CT imaging cannot be verified via pathologic examination. However, these lesions may be cancerous and would thus require additional treatment or follow-up. Using MRI [25], contrast-enhanced CT, ultrasound, AFP test, and biopsy, accurate differential diagnoses were made for these additional lesions to exclude benign disease. However, a small subset of tiny lesions may be misdiagnosed as cancerous lesions and be over-treated. With TACE and lipiodol CT, most malignant lesions can be detected and treated. Cancerous lesions diagnosed preoperatively in the same patient were confirmed and effectively treated.

More precise techniques should be developed to further differentiate tiny HCC with higher diagnostic confidence. However, this is a retrospective study. A prospective multi-center randomized study is needed.

In conclusion, we indicated that the combination of TACE and percutaneous thermal ablation improved the survival of patients with HCC compared with hepatectomy. Lipiodol CT may assist in the detection of additional cancerous lesions in the liver.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine

References

  1. Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Zhao P, Li G, Wu L, et al. Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013;25:10–21.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wei KR, Yu X, Zheng RS, Peng XB, Zhang SW, Ji MF, et al. Incidence and mortality of liver cancer in China, 2010. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33:388–94.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Peng ZW, Lin XJ, Zhang YJ, Liang HH, Guo RP, Shi M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas 2 cm or smaller: a retrospective comparative study. Radiology. 2012;262:1022–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung YH. A strategy for early detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following initial remission by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Intervirology. 2005;48:46–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yumoto Y, Jinno K, Tokuyama K, Araki Y, Ishimitsu T, Maeda H, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma detected by iodized oil. Radiology. 1985;154:19–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zheng XH, Guan YS, Zhou XP, Huang J, Sun L, Li X, et al. Detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of multi-detector CT with digital subtraction angiography and Lipiodol CT. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:200–3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Peng ZW, Zhang YJ, Chen MS, Xu L, Liang HH, Lin XJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:426–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Takuma Y, Takabatake H, Morimoto Y, Toshikuni N, Kayahara T, Makino Y, et al. Comparison of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation with surgical resection by using propensity score matching in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria. Radiology. 2013;269:927–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001;35:421–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhao M, Wang JP, Pan CC, Li W, Huang ZL, Zhang L, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation after with transarterial chemoembolization in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with long overall survival improvement. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2717–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruix J, Sherman M. American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tashiro H, Aikata H, Waki K, Amano H, Oshita A, Kobayashi T, et al. Treatment strategy for early hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison of radiofrequency ablation with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and surgical resection. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:3–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pan CC, Huang ZL, Li W, Zhao M, Zhou QM, Xia JC, et al. Serum alpha-fetoprotein measurement in predicting clinical outcome related to autologous cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergone minimally invasive therapy. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:596–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yin X, Zhang L, Wang YH, Zhang BH, Gan YH, Ge NL, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation delays tumor progression and prolongs overall survival in patients with intermediate (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:849.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH, Yu SJ, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, et al. Small single-nodule hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic resection by using inverse probability weighting. Radiology. 2014;271:909–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim JW, Shin SS, Kim JK, Choi SK, Heo SH, Lim HS, et al. Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma of 2 to 5 cm in diameter: comparison with surgical resection. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:626–35.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kagawa T, Koizumi J, Kojima S, Nagata N, Numata M, Watanabe N, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation therapy for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with surgical resection. Cancer. 2010;116:3638–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sumie S, Kuromatsu R, Okuda K, Ando E, Takata A, Fukushima N, et al. Microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictable clinicopathological factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1375–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rossi S, Ravetta V, Rosa L, Ghittoni G, Viera FT, Garbagnati F, et al. Repeated radiofrequency ablation for management of patients with cirrhosis with small hepatocellular carcinomas: a long-term cohort study. Hepatology. 2011;53:136–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Verslype C, Rosmorduc O, Rougier P, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:vii41–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Otto G, Schuchmann M, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Heise M, Weinmann A, Hansen T, et al. How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE? J Hepatol. 2013;59:279–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim BK, Kim KA, Park JY, Ahn SH, Chon CY, Han KH, et al. Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:826–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Beard RE, Hanto DW, Gautam S, Miksad RA. A comparison of surgical outcomes for noncirrhotic and cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma patients in a Western institution. Surgery. 2013;154:545–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bian DJ, Xiao EH, Hu DX, Chen XY, Situ WJ, Yuan SW, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy on hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:198–201. [in Chinese].View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement