Open Access

A comprehensive genomic characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: from prognostic analysis to in vivo assay

Chinese Journal of Cancer201635:76

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0142-y

Received: 16 June 2016

Accepted: 17 June 2016

Published: 11 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and is characterized by numerous genetic mutations. TNM staging is not sufficient for predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, ESCC shows poor responsiveness to chemotherapy and radiation. Thus, there is an urgent need to find efficient therapy targets. Previous ESCC high-throughput genomic studies have lacked intensive survival analysis, particularly for copy number variation (CNV) and the genes involved.

Main body

In the study “Genomic Characterization of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveals Critical Genes Underlying Tumorigenesis and Poor Prognosis” recently published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, we comprehensively analyzed the effects of CNVs, mutations, and relative gene expression on patient outcomes. To validate our findings for our 67 sequencing samples, we collected a 321-patient retrospective cohort with detailed 5-year follow-up information and carried out univariate and multivariate survival analyses. In addition, the biological functions of the survival predictors in ESCC were investigated both in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions

We found the independent ESCC survival predictors and potential therapy targets. Nevertheless, the effects of numerous low-frequency mutations need to be explored using larger sample sequencing. Overall, constructing multi-gene prognostic signatures will remain a great challenge in the future.

Keywords

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Copy number variation Prognostic analysis

Background

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, with approximately 456,000 new cases per year globally [14]. There are two main esophageal cancer histological subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma [5]. ESCC accounts for 80% of esophageal cancer cases worldwide, and the risk is influenced by environmental factors (alcohol consumption and tobacco use) and genetic factors. Only 15%–25% ESCC patients survive for 5 years [6, 7].

Although staging of the tumor is important for determining the therapeutic strategy, it cannot precisely predict prognosis. Thus, a signature for classifying patients as potential therapy responders or non-responders would be of great clinical use if performed using initial diagnostic biopsies.

The poor responsiveness of ESCC to chemotherapy and radiation is a main reason for poor patient outcomes. Moreover, efficient targeted medicine for ESCC treatment is lacking to date. Therefore, the mechanisms underlining the poor prognosis of this disease are essential for finding therapy targets.

Several ESCC high-throughput genomic sequencing studies have been reported recently [811]; however, none has comprehensively evaluated both the effects of copy number variations (CNVs) and mutations on patient prognosis.

Main body

In our recent article entitled “Genomic Characterization of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveals Critical Genes Underlying Tumorigenesis and Poor Prognosis” published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, we reported a high-throughput genomic sequencing study of ESCC. By detecting and characterizing somatic variants, we comprehensively analyzed the effects of CNVs, mutations, and relative gene expression on patients’ overall survival (OS). For essential genes, further biological experiments were carried out in vitro and in vivo. The goal was to identify critical mutations underlying the poor prognosis of ESCC and to find potential prognosis makers and therapy targets [12].

In the 67 samples comprising the sequencing cohort, 19,434 mutations were found in exon regions of the ESCC genome. Using MutSigCV software [13], tumor protein p53 (TP53), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), notch homolog 1, translocation-associated (Drosophila) (NOTCH1), and nuclear factor, erythroid 2 like 2 (NFE2L2) were identified as significantly mutated genes. These four genes were then subjected to OS analysis. The results showed that patients harboring NOTCH1 mutations had a longer lifespan after surgery than those without mutations. In addition, using a cohort of independent 321 samples, we found that individuals with lower NOTCH1 expression had a higher 5-year OS rate than those with higher NOTCH1 levels. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that after adjustment for age, sex, tumor stage, smoking, and alcohol consumption, NOTCH1 expression was significantly associated with OS. These findings suggest that NOTCH1 might play an essential role in ESCC progression.

Compared with mutations, we found much higher frequencies of CNVs in ESCC. To explore their influence on survival, both CNVs and expression of the associated genes were detected by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). A number of CNVs and genes were found to be associated with poor patient outcomes.

MYB proto-oncogene like 2 (MYBL2), a reported cell cycle regulator, showed elevated gene copy numbers in 70% of the tumors subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Its transcripts and protein were also overexpressed in ESCC compared with adjacent normal tissues. Both the gene copy number and expression of MYBL2 showed negative effects on individuals’ survival. In vitro studies demonstrated that overexpression of MYBL2 increased proliferation in ESCC cell lines.

Non-coding RNA plays an important role in tumorigenesis and development. However, previous comparative genomic hybridization studies mainly focused on coding genes. In our study, a CNV-harbored microRNA, miR-4707-5p, was found to be significantly overexpressed in tumors, and individuals with high miR-4707-5p levels exhibited worse prognosis than those with low miR-4707-5p levels. An in vitro pilot experiment revealed that miR-4707-5p has a strong ability to promote cell migration and invasion. The pro-metastasis ability of miR-4707-5p was confirmed in two different mouse tumor metastasis models. Furthermore, through mechanism studies, we found that miR-4707-5p can decrease E-cadherin by targeting adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1 (ADARB1), in turn promoting cell metastasis. Therefore, the CNV-miR-4707-5p-ADARB1-E-cadherin axis might be a target of ESCC therapy.

Interestingly, VANGL planar cell polarity protein 1 (VANGL1), a novel high-frequency mutant gene that we found, showed no association with ESCC prognosis. Thus, VANGL1 mutation might play a role only at early stages of the neoplastic process.

Although a list of prognosis predictors was found, we could not rule out the possibility that low-frequency mutations also have an impact on prognosis, at least for particular individuals. However, due to the limited sample size, the association between these low-frequency mutant genes and ESCC prognosis could not be analyzed in this study. As cancer occurrence and development are the result of the participation of multiple genes, a multi-gene prognostic signature would be more convincing, though this is difficult to realize because of the limited sample size, low frequency of mutations, and complexity of genomic variants.

Conclusions

Through a comprehensive genomic study and gene expression analysis, we identified a number of independent prognosis predictors. We showed that at least two of them, MYBL2 and miR-4707-5p, are involved in ESCC cell malignant transformation and might be a basis for poor ESCC prognosis. Considering the decreasing cost of sequencing, experiments with larger sample sizes and more serviceable algorithms would help in the future search for a multi-gene prognostic signature.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YBC drafted the manuscript. WHJ reviewed and revised the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine

References

  1. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, et al. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):400–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2137–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. The updated incidences and mortalities of major cancers in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34(11):502–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2499–509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2241–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, Ferson PF, Gooding WE, Gibson MK, et al. Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(4):1048–54 (discussion 1054–5).View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin DC, Hao JJ, Nagata Y, Xu L, Shang L, Meng X, et al. Genomic and molecular characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(5):467–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, et al. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature. 2014;509(7498):91–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao YB, Chen ZL, Li JG, Hu XD, Shi XJ, Sun ZM, et al. Genetic landscape of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1097–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cheng C, Cui H, Cheng L, Kong P, et al. Genomic analyses reveal mutational signatures and frequently altered genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(4):597–611.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Qin HD, Liao XY, Chen YB, Huang SY, Xue WQ, Li FF, et al. Genomic characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma reveals critical genes underlying tumorigenesis and poor prognosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(4):709–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P, Kryukov GV, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature. 2013;499(7457):214–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement