Open Access

Proportion and clinical features of never-smokers with non-small cell lung cancer

  • Jaeyoung Cho1,
  • Sun Mi Choi1,
  • Jinwoo Lee1,
  • Chang-Hoon Lee1,
  • Sang-Min Lee1,
  • Dong-Wan Kim1,
  • Jae-Joon Yim1,
  • Young Tae Kim2,
  • Chul-Gyu Yoo1,
  • Young Whan Kim1,
  • Sung Koo Han1 and
  • Young Sik Park1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Chinese Journal of Cancer201736:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-017-0187-6

Received: 9 March 2016

Accepted: 23 August 2016

Published: 8 February 2017

Abstract

Background

The proportion of never-smokers with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing, but that in Korea has not been well addressed in a large population. We aimed to evaluate the proportion and clinical features of never-smokers with NSCLC in a large single institution.

Methods

We analyzed clinical data of 1860 consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed with NSCLC between June 2011 and December 2014.

Results

Of the 1860 NSCLC patients, 707 (38.0%) were never-smokers. The proportions of women (83.7% vs. 5.6%) and adenocarcinoma (89.8% vs. 44.9%) were higher among never-smokers than among ever-smokers. Significantly more never-smokers were diagnosed at a younger median age (65 vs. 68 years, P < 0.001) and earlier stage (stage I–II, 44.5% vs. 38.9%, P = 0.015) compared with ever-smokers. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (57.8% vs. 24.4%, P < 0.001) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements (7.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) were more common in never-smokers, whereas Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog mutations (5.8% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.021) were less frequently encountered in never-smokers than in ever-smokers. Never-smokers showed longer survival after adjusting for the favorable effects of younger age, female sex, adenocarcinoma histology, better performance status, early stage disease, being asymptomatic at diagnosis, received antitumor treatment, and the presence of driver mutations (hazard ratio, 0.624; 95% confidence interval, 0.460–0.848; P = 0.003).

Conclusions

More than one-third of the Korean patients with NSCLC were never-smokers. NSCLC in never-smokers had different clinical characteristics and major driver mutations and resulted in longer overall survival compared with NSCLC in ever-smokers.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung carcinoma Never-smoker Epidermal growth factor receptor KRAS Prognosis

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, accounting for an estimated 1.6 million deaths in 2012 worldwide [1]. In Korea, lung cancer has been the most common cause of cancer death since 1999 and was expected to account for 22.6% of all cancer deaths in 2012, although the age-standardized mortality due to lung cancer has decreased slightly in both men and women since 2002 [2]. Lung cancer is considered a preventable cancer because tobacco smoking is the major cause of lung cancer [3]. According to comprehensive tobacco control programs, the incidence of lung cancer has been decreasing, whereas the proportion of never-smoking patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing [4, 5]. Global statistics estimate that overall 25% of lung cancers worldwide occur in never-smokers, and this proportion is approximately 10%–15% in Western countries [6]. The percentage is higher in Eastern Asia, as studies from Japan [5] and Singapore [7] have reported that never-smokers comprise approximately 32% of NSCLC patients.

It has been suggested that NSCLC in never-smokers should be regarded as a separate disease entity, as it bears striking differences from NSCLC in ever-smokers in terms of its epidemiologic and clinical characteristics; never-smokers with NSCLC are mostly women and have adenocarcinoma histology [5, 7, 8]. Recent molecular epidemiologic studies have supported that NSCLC in never-smokers has distinct underlying molecular mechanisms. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are more frequent in never-smokers with NSCLC, whereas Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations are associated with ever-smokers [911]. These genetic alterations occur in a mutually exclusive fashion, providing evidence that NSCLC in never-smokers arises through different genetic pathways [8, 12].

Although there have been several studies reporting the clinical characteristics and prognosis of never-smoking NSCLC patients in Eastern Asia [5, 7], large-scale studies in the Korean population are lacking. This study was aimed to evaluate the proportion and clinical features of never-smokers with NSCLC in a large single institution in Korea.

Patients and methods

Patients

This study included all consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed with NSCLC at the Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea between June 2011 and December 2014. Patients with recurred NSCLC were excluded. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Seoul National University Hospital (H-1401-033-548). The requirement for informed consent was waived.

Clinical and pathologic variables

All data were collected from medical records. Subjects were categorized based on the smoking status as never- and ever-smokers. An individual who had a lifetime exposure of <100 cigarettes was defined as a never-smoker. An individual who smoked no <100 cigarettes during one’s lifetime was defined as an ever-smoker. The clinical and pathologic data reviewed for analysis included age, sex, symptoms at diagnosis, histologic subtype, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, disease stage, treatment received. Disease stage was defined as pathologic tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage for surgical cases and clinical TNM stage for non-surgical cases at the time of initial diagnosis, according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual [13].

Mutational analysis

DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue as per the standard protocol. Initially, the EGFR mutation status (exons 18–21) and the KRAS mutation status (exon 2) of the extracted DNA were determined with nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by bidirectional direct sequencing, as previously described [14]. However, after peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping technology was recognized as a more sensitive method compared to direct sequencing for the detection of gene mutations in diagnostic specimens with a low proportion of tumor cells [15], PNA-mediated real-time PCR clamping replaced direct sequencing since February 1, 2013. The PNAClamp EGFR Mutation Detection Kit (Panagene Inc., Daejeon, Korea) was used as previously described [15]. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were detected with PNA-mediated real-time PCR. To test for ALK rearrangements, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ALK protein expression was used as a screening modality, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used for confirmation. Unstained slides of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were analyzed with FISH using the Vysis ALK Dual Color, Break Apart Rearrangement probe (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL, USA) as previously described [16]. ALK rearrangements were defined via split ALK 5′ and 3′ probe signals or isolated 3′ signals in more than 15% of scored tumor cells [17].

Follow-up

The schedules of follow-up were determined by clinicians. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or the date of last follow-up. Death certificate data were obtained from the Korea National Statistical Office on 16 February 2015. The last follow-up was performed in February 2015.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as median (range), whereas categorical data are presented as numbers (percentages). Clinicopathologic variables between never-smokers and ever-smokers were compared using the independent samples t test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. The OS rates were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences among the groups were tested using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for variables with a P < 0.2 in the univariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata statistical software (Version 12.0, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Clinical characteristics

A total of 1860 NSCLC patients diagnosed during the study period were selected. Of the 1860 patients, 707 (38.0%) were never-smokers, and 1153 (62.0%) were ever-smokers. The characteristics of 1860 NSCLC patients according to smoking status are listed in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis of never-smokers was significantly younger than that of ever-smokers (65 vs. 68 years, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of women were observed in the group of never-smokers than in the group of ever-smokers (P < 0.001), and the proportion of adenocarcinoma was higher in never-smokers than in ever-smokers (P < 0.001). Never-smokers had better ECOG performance status (P < 0.001), tended to present with earlier stage disease (stage I–II, 44.5% vs. 38.9%, P = 0.015), and were more likely to be asymptomatic than ever-smokers (P < 0.001).
Table 1

Characteristics of 1860 patients with NSCLC according to smoking status

Variable

Never-smokers [cases (%)]

Ever-smokers [cases (%)]

P

Total

707 (38.0)

1153 (62.0)

 

Sex

  

<0.001

 Men

115 (16.3)

1088 (94.4)

 

 Women

592 (83.7)

65 (5.6)

 

Histologic subtype

  

<0.001

 Adenocarcinoma

635 (89.8)

518 (44.9)

 

 Squamous cell carcinoma

25 (3.5)

483 (41.9)

 

 Others

47 (6.7)

152 (13.2)

 

ECOG PS

  

<0.001

 0

379 (53.6)

427 (37.0)

 

 1

269 (38.1)

558 (48.4)

 

 2

43 (6.1)

131 (11.4)

 

 3

15 (2.1)

31 (2.7)

 

 4

1 (0.1)

6 (0.5)

 

Symptoms at diagnosis

  

<0.001

 Asymptomatic

417 (59.0)

487 (42.2)

 

 Symptomatic

290 (41.0)

666 (57.8)

 

Driver mutations

   

 EGFR mutations (n = 1284)

353 (57.8)

164 (24.4)

<0.001

 KRAS mutations (n = 1089)

29 (5.8)

57 (9.6)

0.021

 ALK rearrangements (n = 1288)

47 (7.8)

19 (2.8)

<0.001

Stage

  

<0.001

 I

261 (36.9)

295 (25.6)

 

 II

54 (7.6)

153 (13.3)

 

 III

115 (16.3)

293 (25.4)

 

 IV

277 (39.2)

412 (35.7)

 

Treatment

  

<0.001

 Antitumor

654 (92.5)

983 (85.3)

 

 Supportive/unknown

53 (7.5)

170 (14.7)

 

NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, PS performance status, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase

Frequencies of driver mutations according to smoking status

Of the 1860 patients, 1284 were tested for EGFR mutations, 1288 were tested for ALK rearrangements, and 1089 were tested for KRAS mutations. As expected, the frequencies of EGFR mutations (353/611 [57.8%] vs. 164/673 [24.4%]) and ALK rearrangements (47/605 [7.8%] vs. 19/683 [2.8%]) were significantly higher in never-smokers than in ever-smokers (both P < 0.001) (Table 1). Among the EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and exon 21 point mutations were significantly associated with never-smoking status (all P < 0.001), whereas mutations in exons 18 and 20 were not (P = 0.227, P = 0.167, respectively).

Of the 1089 NSCLC patients who were tested for KRAS mutations, 86 (7.9%) patients harbored a KRAS mutation. KRAS mutations were detected less frequently in never-smokers than in ever-smokers (29/497 [5.8%] vs. 57/592 [9.6%], P = 0.021) (Table 1). Of the 86 cases of KRAS mutations, 6 were detected with PNA clamping at codon 12; 80 were detected with direct sequencing (Table 2). Gly12Cys (28/80, 35.0%) was the most frequent KRAS mutation, followed by Gly12Asp (22/80, 27.5%) in Korean NSCLC patients. Of the 80 KRAS mutations, 27 (33.8%) were transition mutations. Gly12Asp was the most frequent KRAS mutation in never-smokers. The transition:transversion ratio of KRAS mutations was 12:15 for never-smokers and 15:38 for ever-smokers (P = 0.149).
Table 2

Type and frequency of KRAS mutations according to smoking status in 80 patients with NSCLC

KRAS mutation

Nucleotide substitution

Amino acid substitution

Never-smokers [cases (%)]

Ever-smokers [cases (%)]

Total [cases (%)]

Transversion

GGT>TGT

Gly12Cys

6 (22.2)

22 (41.5)

28 (35.0)

 

GGT>GTT

Gly12Val

7 (25.9)

12 (22.6)

19 (23.8)

 

GGT>GCT

Gly12Ala

2 (7.4)

3 (5.7)

5 (6.3)

 

GGT>TTT

Gly12Phe

0

1 (1.9)

1 (1.3)

Transition

GGT>GAT

Gly12Asp

11 (40.7)

11 (20.8)

22 (27.5)

 

GGT>AGT

Gly12Ser

0

2 (3.8)

2 (2.5)

 

GGC>GAC

Gly13Asp

0

2 (3.8)

2 (2.5)

 

CAG>CGG

Gln22Arg

1 (3.7)

0

1 (1.3)

Total

  

27

53

80

KRAS Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer

In the subgroup of 1153 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the frequencies of EGFR mutations (341/570 [59.8%] vs. 153/434 [35.3%], P < 0.001) and ALK rearrangements (46/566 [8.1%] vs. 18/436 [4.1%], P = 0.010) were significantly higher in never-smokers than in ever-smokers, whereas the frequency of KRAS mutations was significantly lower in never-smokers than in ever-smokers (29/466 [6.2%] vs. 50/377 [13.3%], P < 0.001) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Frequencies of driver mutations in 1153 patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to smoking status. EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase. n is the number of patients with lung adenocarcinoma who were tested for each mutation

Survival analysis

The median follow-up time was 14.8 months (interquartile range 6.2–26.6 months). A total of 675 deaths (36.3%) occurred during follow-up. Never-smokers showed longer survival than ever-smokers (Fig. 2). The median OS were not yet reached for never-smokers and was 23.9 months for ever-smokers (95% CI 19.9–27.0 months). The 2-year OS rates were 75.8% for never-smokers and 49.8% for ever-smokers (P < 0.001).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of 1860 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to smoking status

In addition to smoking status, the prognostic factors determined by univariate analyses were age, sex, histologic subtype, ECOG performance status, disease stage, the presence of symptoms at diagnosis, EGFR mutations, KRAS mutations, ALK rearrangements, and treatment received. A multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox proportional hazards model including those factors, in which never-smoking status was associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.624; 95% CI 0.460–0.848; P = 0.003) (Table 3). Younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, better performance status, earlier stage, being asymptomatic at diagnosis, and antitumor treatment were also independent favorable prognostic factors. EGFR mutations (HR 0.493; 95% CI 0.381–0.637; P < 0.001) and ALK rearrangements (HR 0.397; 95% CI 0.239–0.660; P < 0.001) were associated with prolonged OS, whereas KRAS mutations were associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.560; 95% CI 1.085–2.243; P = 0.017).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of overall survival using the Cox regression in 1860 patients with NSCLC

Variable

Whole cohort (n = 1860)

Never-smokers (n = 707)

Ever-smokers (n = 1153)

HR

95% CI

P

HR

95% CI

P

HR

95% CI

P

Smoking status

   

NA

  

NA

  

 Ever-smoker

1.000

        

 Never-smoker

0.624

0.460–0.848

0.003

      

Agea

1.023

1.014–1.032

<0.001

1.005

0.988–1.021

0.582

1.029

1.018–1.040

<0.001

Sex

         

 Male

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Female

1.054

0.780–1.426

0.731

0.977

0.619–1.544

0.922

1.179

0.794–1.750

0.414

Histologic subtype

         

 Adenocarcinoma

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Squamous cell carcinoma

1.387

1.115–1.727

0.003

2.262

1.131–4.523

0.021

1.295

1.019–1.645

0.035

 Others

1.506

1.184–1.915

0.001

1.066

0.618–1.839

0.818

1.586

1.201–2.095

0.001

ECOG PS

         

 0–1

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 2–4

2.098

1.725–2.552

<0.001

2.743

1.732–4.343

<0.001

1.976

1.589–2.457

<0.001

Symptoms at diagnosis

         

 Asymptomatic

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Symptomatic

0.722

0.610–0.854

<0.001

0.715

0.503–1.015

0.061

0.737

0.608–0.894

0.002

EGFR mutationsb

         

 Absent

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Present

0.493

0.381–0.637

<0.001

0.516

0.352–0.757

0.001

0.459

0.314–0.671

<0.001

KRAS mutationsb

         

 Absent

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Present

1.560

1.085–2.243

0.017

2.540

1.253–5.150

0.010

1.416

0.921–2.176

0.113

ALK rearrangementsb

         

 Absent

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Present

0.397

0.239–0.660

<0.001

0.225

0.105–0.484

<0.001

0.723

0.362–1.444

0.358

Stage

         

 I

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 II

2.087

1.387–3.143

<0.001

3.995

1.365–11.694

0.011

1.810

1.163–2.818

0.009

 III

4.323

3.095–6.039

<0.001

4.470

1.872–10.671

0.001

4.036

2.797–5.824

<0.001

 IV

10.314

7.507–14.172

<0.001

23.067

10.840–49.085

<0.001

8.437

5.908–12.049

<0.001

Treatment

         

 Supportive/unknown

1.000

  

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Antitumor

0.634

0.516–0.780

<0.001

0.377

0.214–0.662

0.001

0.678

0.541–0.849

0.001

NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, NA not applicable, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, PS performance status, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase

aAge was used as a continuous variable

bThe individuals who did not undergo testing for each mutation were included in the multivariate analysis, however, the data are not shown

Separate multivariate survival analyses were further conducted for 707 never-smokers and 1153 ever-smokers (Table 3). The histologic subtype, ECOG performance status, disease stage, treatment received, and status of EGFR mutations were common prognostic factors in both never- and ever-smokers. However, younger age and being asymptomatic at diagnosis were no longer associated with prolonged OS in never-smokers. In ever-smokers, KRAS mutations and ALK rearrangements were not independent prognostic factors for OS.

Discussion

In the current study, we summarized the clinical characteristics and major driver mutations of NSCLC patients and compared survival outcomes between never- and ever-smokers in 1860 Korean NSCLC patients. We provided the profile of major genes (EGFR, KRAS, and ALK), and we adjusted for the presence of each driver mutation in the survival analysis. Never-smokers accounted for 38.0% of the NSCLC patients, and smoking status was an independent prognostic factor regardless of whether NSCLC patients had oncogenic driver mutations.

In our study, never-smokers were diagnosed at an earlier age than ever-smokers, which was consistent with a previous report from Singapore [7]. However, several studies from Western countries reported the opposite observation: never-smokers were diagnosed at a similar or older age than ever-smokers [4, 18]. This might be explained by later ages of initiation of smoking in Asian smokers than in Western smokers; because the age at smoking onset in Asian countries is much older than that in Western countries, the age at cancer diagnosis for Asian smokers may be older. In addition, the great contribution of risk factors other than smoking might affect the development of lung cancer in Asian countries [19]. Another interesting observation was that never-smokers tended to present disease at an early stage. This finding was consistent with the result of a study performed in Japan [5], whereas studies from Singapore [7] and the United States [20] reported that never-smokers were more likely to present with advanced disease and another study from the United States found no differences [18].

Although EGFR mutations have been well known as the most common genetic alteration in never-smoking NSCLC patients, EGFR mutations were detected in 24.4% of ever-smoking NSCLC patients in our study. The frequencies of EGFR mutations in ever-smokers vary widely, from 8.4% to 11.9% in Europe and North America to 26.0%–35.9% in Japan and China [21]. Several potential risk factors other than EGFR mutations in never-smokers have been proposed, including environmental tobacco smoke, residential radon, asbestos exposure, cooking oil fumes, genetic susceptibility, hormone factors, and oncogenic viruses, which may contribute with varied degrees in line with sex and geographical areas [8].

In the present study, Gly12Cys, resulting from a codon 12 GGT>TGT substitution, was the most frequent subtype of KRAS mutations, which was consistent with the results of studies in Western countries [22, 23]. However, a recent study analyzing 82 KRAS mutations in 1420 Korean NSCLC patients reported that Gly12Asp, resulting from a codon 12 GGT>GAT substitution, was the most frequent KRAS substitution [24]. In contrast to the previous studies showing that never-smokers were more likely to have a transition mutation rather than a transversion mutation [22, 24], the association between never-smoking status and transition mutations was not statistically significant in our cohort (P = 0.149). Because the frequency of KRAS mutations in the Asian population is relatively low, our study lacked the power to reach any firm conclusions about distinct characteristics of KRAS mutation in the Korean population even though the study included over one thousand NSCLC patients who were tested for KRAS mutations.

Our study has several limitations, such as its retrospective design, and the fact that it was conducted at a single institution. However, our institution is a 1750-bed tertiary teaching hospital and a large referral center in Korea. Moreover, we recruited all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC during the study period to minimize the selection bias. The major limitation of this study was that the information regarding administration of specific targeted agents was not available. The use of targeted therapy may be a confounding factor of inherent mutation status in predicting survival. Another limitation was the relatively short follow-up period. In addition, information about exposure to risk factors other than smoking was unavailable. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential risk factors for NSCLC in never-smokers.

Conclusions

In summary, more than one-third of Korean patients with NSCLC were never-smokers. We showed distinct features of NSCLC in Korean never-smokers compared with ever-smokers, including a better prognosis in never-smokers. After adjusting for the favorable effects of younger age, better performance status, earlier stage of disease, being asymptomatic at diagnosis, and the presence of driver mutations, the association between never-smoking status and prolonged survival became apparent.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JC and YSP had full access to data, writing, and responsibility for the manuscript. CHL, DWK and YWK contributed to data acquisition and analysis. SMC, JL, SML, JJY, CGY and SKH contributed to data acquisition and review of the manuscript. YTK performed surgical resection of lung cancer. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Hospital for statistical analyses.

Competing interests

This work was not funded by any organizations or companies. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Seoul National University Hospital (H-1401-033-548). The requirement for informed consent was waived.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital
(2)
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:127–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Fang B, Mehran RJ, Heymach JV, Swisher SG. Predictive biomarkers in precision medicine and drug development against lung cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:295–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wakelee HA, Chang ET, Gomez SL, Keegan TH, Feskanich D, Clarke CA, et al. Lung cancer incidence in never smokers. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:472–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Yano T, Miura N, Takenaka T, Haro A, Okazaki H, Ohba T, et al. Never-smoking nonsmall cell lung cancer as a separate entity: clinicopathologic features and survival. Cancer. 2008;113:1012–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Toh CK, Gao F, Lim WT, Leong SS, Fong KW, Yap SP, et al. Never-smokers with lung cancer: epidemiologic evidence of a distinct disease entity. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2245–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sun S, Schiller JH, Gazdar AF. Lung cancer in never smokers—a different disease. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:778–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tam IY, Chung LP, Suen WS, Wang E, Wong MC, Ho KK, et al. Distinct epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation patterns in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different tobacco exposure and clinicopathologic features. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:1647–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, Digumarthy SR, Costa DB, Heist RS, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4247–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu S, Wang HY, Wang F, Huang MY, Deng L, Zhang X, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and therapeutic responses of Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer who harbor an anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:404–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gainor JF, Varghese AM, Ou SH, Kabraji S, Awad MM, Katayama R, et al. ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive with mutations in EGFR or KRAS: an analysis of 1,683 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:4273–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  14. Kim YT, Seong YW, Jung YJ, Jeon YK, Park IK, Kang CH, et al. The presence of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene is not a prognostic factor for long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:171–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Han HS, Lim SN, An JY, Lee KM, Choe KH, Lee KH, et al. Detection of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma specimens with different proportions of tumor cells using two methods of differential sensitivity. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:355–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodig SJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Dacic S, Yeap BY, Shaw A, Barletta JA, et al. Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5216–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1693–703.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Nordquist LT, Simon GR, Cantor A, Alberts WM, Bepler G. Improved survival in never-smokers vs current smokers with primary adenocarcinoma of the lung. Chest. 2004;126:347–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownson RC, Alavanja MC, Caporaso N, Simoes EJ, Chang JC. Epidemiology and prevention of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20:218–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dibble R, Langeburg W, Bair S, Ward J, Akerley W, editors. Natual history of non-small cell lung cancer in non-smokers. In: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings; 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Dearden S, Stevens J, Wu YL, Blowers D. Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2371–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Riely GJ, Kris MG, Rosenbaum D, Marks J, Li A, Chitale DA, et al. Frequency and distinctive spectrum of KRAS mutations in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5731–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Maus MKH, Grimminger PP, Mack PC, Astrow SH, Stephens C, Zeger G, et al. KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: implications for EGFR-targeted therapies. Lung Cancer. 2014;83:163–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim EY, Kim A, Kim SK, Kim HJ, Chang J, Ahn CM, et al. KRAS oncogene substitutions in Korean NSCLC patients: clinical implication and relationship with pAKT and RalGTPases expression. Lung Cancer. 2014;85:299–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement